The following presentation provides an overview of recent changes and challenges facing rebar manufacturers, suppliers, and consumers when testing the properties of this durable material:
Share your ideas. Tell us your stories. Join the Instron Community.
Welcome to our new Instron Community Blog hosted by Instron. It is a compilation of the freshest, brightest, most-talented minds that Instron has to offer. The world of materials science is so vast and encompasses the broadest range of industries, materials, and challenges that no one person can possibly possess all the knowledge required to be the resident expert – or master of materials science. It takes a small army behind the scenes collaborating and sharing technical know-how, experiences, and ideas to present the most accurate, relevant, and timely information to you – our readers.
We invite you to tell us who you are, share your stories and talk about your experiences. Join the Instron Community.
We invite you to tell us who you are, share your stories and talk about your experiences. Join the Instron Community.
Friday, June 27, 2014
Challenges of Rebar Testing
The following presentation provides an overview of recent changes and challenges facing rebar manufacturers, suppliers, and consumers when testing the properties of this durable material:
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Composites on the Move
Composites are now a broad
and well-established family of materials, but industry press releases
frequently discuss “new and exciting” developments and opportunities. It should
be remembered that there has been a commercial market in high performance,
structural composites for well over 30 years, and European automotive
manufacturers have made considerable use of lower performance glass fiber
reinforced polyester (GFRP) bodywork since the 1950s.
Furthermore, a high level
of interest from the aerospace industry has resulted in a wide range of
well-established static test methods giving reliable results. Sadly, there is
still only limited consensus, so test houses and machine manufacturers find
themselves maintaining an extensive catalog of fixtures in order to meet
diverse international and industry standards. From this starting point, it
might be argued that there is little news in composites testing, but in fact
some exciting trends have started to develop.
Recently published in AM&P magazine, Peter Bailey, PhD - Sr. Applications Specialist - wrote an article on the growth in the dynamic testing market for composites.
We are including it here for you to download. Read more
Thermal image showing heating at failure of a static tensile test (1mm/min) of an impacted composite specimen |
Recently published in AM&P magazine, Peter Bailey, PhD - Sr. Applications Specialist - wrote an article on the growth in the dynamic testing market for composites.
We are including it here for you to download. Read more
LABELS:
Composites,
Featured Posts
Backward Strain at Yield — Discontinuous Yielding / YPE Material
During a recent customer visit, a concern was raised about a turnaround point on the graph that they had not previously seen. Following a bit of investigation, the customer was producing galvanized steel
of various grades, some of which was aged. The graph below shows a magnified view of the
fairly aggressive upper yield point (UYS or ReH), which results in an almost
immediate drop in stress.
The customer had been testing galvanized steel for many
years and had never seen negative strain at the yield point before. The new
system, which was running Bluehill® 3 with an AutoX, showed backward strain during yield, which proved surprising
to the customer as it was not present in historical data. The AutoX was able to more accurately plot the reduction
in strain (9 µm of movement) at yield due to its increased accuracy over the
previous system.
The negative strain after upper yield is based on
the way metals yield within a parallel section of material. Stress concentrations
form at the shoulders or at the jaw faces in parallel specimens and typically propagate
through the material at 45° angles. As the initial yielding takes place
outside of the gauge length, which causes the stress (load) to drop, the gauge
length contracts and a reduction of strain is seen on the graph. The video shows how the dislocations travel through the material, in this case from the
bottom to the top of the specimen (12—24 seconds).
The diagram below shows how the extensometer arms are unable to see all of this extension.
The diagram below shows how the extensometer arms are unable to see all of this extension.
To verify that the machine was operating correctly and the
backward strain was a material characteristic, we used both larger and much
smaller gauge lengths. The parallel length of the specimen was 65 mm, so a
60 mm and 10 mm gauge length was chosen for comparison. We found that when the 60 mm gauge
length was used, no negative strain was observed. However, when the 10 mm gauge length was
used, the negative strain dramatically increased in percentage.
LABELS:
Featured Posts,
Metals
Does a Charpy or an Izod Impact Test Replicate any Real-Life Scenarios?
Q: Does a Charpy or an Izod impact test replicate any real-life scenarios by impacting the sample on a notched side (Izod) and an unnotched side (Charpy)?
A: The answer to this question is "No".
The Charpy and Izod impact tests are designed to evaluate the impact strength of materials under very well-defined conditions. They produce results that are comparative only and their impact configurations are not deliberately designed to replicate real-life scenarios.
The Charpy impact test is done in a three-point bend configuration, whereas the Izod impact test is done in a cantilever beam configuration. Therefore, the specimen is mounted differently in each set up.
In the Izod impact test, the specimen is impacted on the notched side, whereas in a Charpy impact test the specimen is impacted on the
unnotched side. However in both cases, the notch serves as the stress
concentration zone and thus it is important to control the tip radius
and notch depth to obtain reliable results.
Read more
A: The answer to this question is "No".
The Charpy and Izod impact tests are designed to evaluate the impact strength of materials under very well-defined conditions. They produce results that are comparative only and their impact configurations are not deliberately designed to replicate real-life scenarios.
The Charpy impact test is done in a three-point bend configuration, whereas the Izod impact test is done in a cantilever beam configuration. Therefore, the specimen is mounted differently in each set up.
Charpy Set Up |
Izod Set Up |
Movement of a typical pendulum |
LABELS:
Did You Know?,
FAQs,
Impact Testing
Monday, June 23, 2014
Reducing Variablity in Plastics Testing
Although you may be testing to specifications that would allow you to comply with international standards, many factors can cause variability in your plastics testing results. The following presentation provides a summary of the most common explanations for test data variability, including specimen alignment and method setup:
Plastics Testing: Reducing Variablity in Test Results
If you would like to learn more about other challenges in plastics testing, read on.
Read more
If you would like to learn more about other challenges in plastics testing, read on.
LABELS:
Did You Know?,
Plastics
Monday, June 16, 2014
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine is Changing the Game
Anna Wynn, Business Development Manager for Instron TERM (Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine) discusses how this science can potentially provide a better quality of life for the population. Instron TERM systems produce 3D tissue comparable to native tissue, which can serve as a substitute or enhancement for tissue impaired by disease, injury, or age.
Read more as Anna reviews common challenges in the field and its growth potential.
LABELS:
Biomedical,
TERM
Friday, June 13, 2014
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
Plastics Testing: Increasing Laboratory Efficiency & Throughput
The following presentation suggests ways that laboratories can operate more efficiently when testing plastics, including improving set up times and methods:
Plastics Testing: Increasing Laboratory Efficiency & Throughput from Instron
If you would like to learn more about other challenges in plastics testing, read on.
Read more
If you would like to learn more about other challenges in plastics testing, read on.
Monday, June 9, 2014
Instron's European Sales Director Discusses Rental Program
Tom Davies, European Sales Director, talks with AZoM about our contract rental program, piloted in the United Kingdom. The program offers the flexibility to rent Instron systems and accessories with no upfront investment. A rental can be issued on a monthly or a quarterly basis in order to try the latest equipment.
Since the program began last autumn in the UK., it has received significant interest and may be expanding to other countries.
LABELS:
Accessories,
AZOM,
Did You Know?,
Impact Testing,
Plastics,
Products,
Rheology
Friday, June 6, 2014
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Understanding Changes to Key Plastics Testing Standards
Are you aware of the recent changes to various international standards for plastics testing? This presentation provides a brief summary:
Understanding Changes to Key Plastics Testing Standards
Read more
If you would like to learn more about other challenges in plastics testing, such as variability and efficiency, read on.
LABELS:
Plastics
Monday, June 2, 2014
Instron Recognizes Young Scientists in Darmstadt
Research shared at the Symposium came from across the globe. The topics highlighted this year revolved around welded and bolted joints, effects of corrosion, thermomechanical and low cycle fatigue, lightweight design as well as fatigue testing.
As in previous years, Instron awarded scientific studies in the field of fatigue related research. This year a group of four young scientists from Darmstadt were awarded for their work on "Fatigue Assessment of Weld Ends".
Dr.-Ing. Matthias Kaffenberger; M.Sc. Ehsan Shams; Dipl.-Ing. Ina Platte; Erik Schmidt-Staubach; and M.Sc. Franziska Strobel
(Image Source: Fraunhofer LBF | Artist: Claus Borgenheimer)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)