Welcome to our new Instron Community Blog hosted by Instron. It is a compilation of the freshest, brightest, most-talented minds that Instron has to offer. The world of materials science is so vast and encompasses the broadest range of industries, materials, and challenges that no one person can possibly possess all the knowledge required to be the resident expert – or master of materials science. It takes a small army behind the scenes collaborating and sharing technical know-how, experiences, and ideas to present the most accurate, relevant, and timely information to you – our readers.

We invite you to tell us who you are, share your stories and talk about your experiences. Join the Instron Community.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Backward Strain at Yield — Discontinuous Yielding / YPE Material

During a recent customer visit, a concern was raised about a turnaround point on the graph that they had not previously seen. Following a bit of investigation, the customer was producing galvanized steel of various grades, some of which was aged. The graph below shows a magnified view of the fairly aggressive upper yield point (UYS or ReH), which results in an almost immediate drop in stress.
 
The customer had been testing galvanized steel for many years and had never seen negative strain at the yield point before. The new system, which was running Bluehill® 3 with an AutoX, showed backward strain during yield, which proved surprising to the customer as it was not present in historical data. The AutoX was able to more accurately plot the reduction in strain (9 µm of movement) at yield due to its increased accuracy over the previous system.
 

The negative strain after upper yield is based on the way metals yield within a parallel section of material. Stress concentrations form at the shoulders or at the jaw faces in parallel specimens and typically propagate through the material at 45° angles. As the initial yielding takes place outside of the gauge length, which causes the stress (load) to drop, the gauge length contracts and a reduction of strain is seen on the graph. The video shows how the dislocations travel through the material, in this case from the bottom to the top of the specimen (1224 seconds).

The diagram below shows how the extensometer arms are unable to see all of this extension.
 
 
To verify that the machine was operating correctly and the backward strain was a material characteristic, we used both larger and much smaller gauge lengths. The parallel length of the specimen was 65 mm, so a 60 mm and 10 mm gauge length was chosen for comparison. We found that when the 60 mm gauge length was used, no negative strain was observed. However, when the 10 mm gauge length was used, the negative strain dramatically increased in percentage.

2 comments:

Krishnaraj said...

Extremely interesting! What an observation by both the equipment user and an equally brilliant insight into behavior of metal by Instron!!

Anonymous said...

This is a true effect during some tests. It is only with very good equipment and software is this able to be captured.